Would some one please tell Laura Ingraham if she really cares about her listeners and her credibilty she needs to stop endorsing/promoting life lock. The company owner Todd Davis is being sued in several states and is also being sued by Experian for his companies practices. He himself has been a victim of i d theft multiple times and his guarantee that you won't become a victim of i d theft if you have life lock is 100% false. Nothing can stop you from ever becoming a victim of i d theft because there are 5 types of i d theft 1) social security number, 2) drivers lic., 3) medical, 4) character/criminal and 5) financial which is often confused with fraud. Life lock can in no way protect any one from the non-financial forms of i d theft because obviously these types of i d theft will not appear on you credit report, but they will adversely effect you personal medical records, drivers lic. record, criminal record etc. These are serious and life altering, sometimes life threatening occurances.

 

If Ms Ingraham wants us to believe she is credible in her opinopns and research on "the issues" I would suggest that she also do more checking into services that she endorses because it looks to me like she is taking the money without concern for the quality or credibility of the product and that has hurt her cedibility with me.

 

This may not be a big deal to Ms Ingraham, my opinion about this issue, but I do carry credibility myself in what I say beacuase I am a i d theft risk management professional.

 

Respectfully,

 

Christopher Earl, Certified Identity Theft Risk Management Specialist (CITRMS) and volunteer for the FTC Deter Detect Defend Avoid I D Theft program.